The recent Europa League victory in Bilbao was a moment of glory for Tottenham Hotspur, securing a trophy that had eluded them for far too long. However, according to Jonathan Wilson, this single triumph shouldn't necessarily guarantee Ange Postecoglou's long-term future at the club. While the win is significant, it's crucial to examine the broader context of Spurs' performance and whether Postecoglou's vision truly aligns with the club's ambitions.

Wilson argues that Spurs's recent form has been pragmatic, a departure from the attacking football Postecoglou initially promised. While pragmatism can be effective, it raises questions about whether the team is genuinely progressing towards a distinct playing style or simply adapting to circumstances. Injuries have undoubtedly played a role, but the fundamental issue remains: is there a clear, discernible path from Postecoglou's initial vision to the team's current state?

Furthermore, the Europa League, while a prestigious trophy, needs to be viewed in perspective. Premier League teams possess a significant financial advantage in this competition. Postecoglou's previous successes in Japan and Scotland came when he managed the strongest teams, and Wilson suggests a similar dynamic might be at play here.

The central question, as Wilson poses, is whether Postecoglou is perceived as a "winner" who can consistently find ways to achieve results. If the club believes in his ability to deliver sustained success, then retaining him is a logical choice. However, if the win in Bilbao feels like an isolated incident, a lucky break in an otherwise inconsistent season, then a more critical evaluation is warranted.

Ultimately, Daniel Levy's decision hinges on whether he believes Postecoglou is the right man to lead Spurs forward. If a suitable replacement is available, someone like Andoni Iraola, a change might be justifiable. However, a hasty decision without a clear plan could backfire, potentially leaving the club in a worse situation than before.

The scenario Wilson presents is thought-provoking: would the assessment of Postecoglou's position differ had Spurs lost in Bilbao? If the answer is yes, then it raises concerns about whether a single, somewhat unconvincing victory has unduly swayed opinions. A long-term strategy should not be dictated by short-term outcomes, especially when the performance itself was not particularly inspiring.

In conclusion, while the Europa League victory in Bilbao provided a welcome moment of celebration for Spurs, it shouldn't mask the underlying questions about the team's direction under Postecoglou. Levy's decision requires careful consideration of the broader picture, weighing the value of a trophy against the need for a clear, sustainable path to future success. A glorious blip, while enjoyable, is not enough to justify complacency.