Following India's disappointing loss in the first Test against England at Headingley, Leeds, former Indian spinner Ravichandran Ashwin has openly questioned Mohammed Siraj's performance, particularly his economy rate. India failed to defend a total of 371, and Ashwin believes a lack of control from one end contributed significantly to the defeat.
Siraj, known for his aggressive approach and wicket-taking ability, conceded 122 runs in his 27 overs during the first innings, picking up two wickets, and then 51 runs in 14 overs in the second innings without taking any wickets. This translates to an economy rate of 4.22, which is considerably higher than Jasprit Bumrah's 3.2. Ashwin believes that while wickets are valuable, Siraj needs to focus on containing the flow of runs to ease the pressure on the other bowlers, especially Bumrah.
Ashwin, speaking on his YouTube channel, stated that he wasn't necessarily expecting Siraj to pick up wickets consistently, but rather to "dry up the run flow." He questioned whether Siraj could avoid giving away 4-5 runs every over. According to Ashwin, when runs are constantly being leaked, it forces the captain to bring Bumrah back into the attack more frequently, potentially leading to fatigue and shorter spells. This, in turn, allows partnerships to build and puts India at a disadvantage. He further added, "How many dams will Bumrah be able to construct?".
Ashwin suggested that Siraj should look to emulate the role that India's current bowling coach, Morne Morkel, played for South Africa. Morkel was known for his accuracy and ability to maintain pressure from one end, allowing strike bowlers like Dale Steyn to attack. Ashwin highlighted that Morkel would often bowl spells of 20 overs, conceding around 43 runs and picking up two wickets. While acknowledging the aggressive nature of modern "Bazball" cricket might mean a slightly higher economy is acceptable, the core principle of containment remains crucial. He suggested figures of 2/58 would be acceptable in the current era.
He emphasized that Siraj needs to adopt a "bankable role" and understand that preventing runs is as important as taking wickets, especially when Prasidh Krishna is relatively new to the team and may be less experienced in controlling the scoring rate.
Ashwin even pointed to Ishant Sharma's past performances for India, noting how Sharma would often bowl long spells and concede very few runs, building pressure and creating opportunities for wickets at the other end. While not expecting Siraj to replicate Sharma's exact style, Ashwin emphasized the importance of controlling the leakage of runs.
Ultimately, Ashwin's message is clear: for India to succeed, Mohammed Siraj needs to add another dimension to his game. He needs to balance his attacking instincts with the ability to bowl tight spells, build pressure, and support the other bowlers in the team. The second Test of the Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy, starting on July 2 in Birmingham, will be a crucial test for Siraj to demonstrate that he can adapt and fulfill this vital role. If Siraj cannot adapt, Ashwin hinted that India might need to consider other options to fulfill that holding role in the bowling attack.
