The recent Anderson-Tendulkar Trophy series between India and England has prompted contrasting reviews for India's pace spearheads, Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj. While Bumrah's talent is undeniable, some observers have pointed out that India didn't win any of the Tests he played in during the series. In contrast, Siraj has been lauded for his leadership qualities and match-winning performances, especially in the absence of Bumrah.
Bumrah featured in three Tests of the series, picking up 14 wickets at an average of 26.00, including two five-wicket hauls. Despite his individual brilliance, India lost two of those matches. Former Australian cricketer Brad Haddin noted that India proved they could perform without Bumrah, highlighting the team's depth in talent. He emphasized that Bumrah "didn't win a Test match" in the series. Alastair Cook, former England captain, also observed the same trend, noting that India lost the two matches where Bumrah played. Bumrah himself acknowledged the "competitive and enthralling" series on social media. He took to Instagram to express his joy, writing, "We take back great memories from a highly competitive and enthralling test series! Looking forward to what's next".
On the other hand, Mohammed Siraj has garnered significant praise for his performance throughout the series. He was the only Indian pacer to play in all five Tests, bowling a remarkable 185.3 overs and taking a series-high 23 wickets at an average of 32. Siraj's defining moment came in the final Test at The Oval, where his sensational spell on the last day led India to a thrilling 6-run victory, leveling the series 2-2. He claimed five wickets in the match, including three crucial dismissals on the final morning, turning the tide in India's favor. His performance earned him the Player of the Match award.
Haddin lauded Siraj for embracing the leadership role in Bumrah's absence, stating that Siraj "likes being the leader of the attack". He added that Siraj thrives under pressure and isn't afraid to make mistakes, qualities that make him a valuable asset to the team. England's coach, Brendon McCullum, also acknowledged Siraj's "fighting spirit" and match-winning performance in the fifth Test. Several reports highlighted Siraj's lion-hearted effort and his ability to inspire his colleagues. In the absence of Bumrah, Siraj led the Indian pace attack and powered India to crucial wins with his determination.
Comparing the two bowlers statistically after 41 Tests, Bumrah had 181 wickets at an average of 20.06, while Siraj had 123 wickets at an average of 31.05. Bumrah's economy was 2.75 with a strike rate of 43.6, compared to Siraj's economy of 3.57 and a strike rate of 52.1. Bumrah had 11 five-wicket hauls compared to Siraj's five. These numbers suggest Bumrah has been statistically more dominant in his first 41 Tests. However, Siraj's recent performances and leadership have made a significant impact, especially in the recent series against England.
Despite Bumrah's absence in the final Test, the Indian bowling unit, spearheaded by Siraj and supported by Prasidh Krishna, delivered a performance for the ages. Krishna took 14 wickets in the series, equaling Bumrah's tally, and his strike rate of 45 was the best among Indian bowlers.
Overall, the series highlighted the contrasting styles and impacts of Bumrah and Siraj. While Bumrah's skill is unquestionable, Siraj's leadership and ability to perform under pressure have shone brightly, solidifying his place as a key member of the Indian pace attack. The series also underscored the depth and potential of India's bowling resources, proving that the team can thrive even without its key players.
