The NHL Network's recently released Top 20 Defensemen list for the upcoming 2025-2026 season has ignited a storm of debate among hockey fans and analysts alike. While such lists are always subjective and bound to generate discussion, this particular ranking has been criticized for perceived snubs, questionable placements, and an overemphasis on offensive statistics.
Topping the list is Cale Makar of the Colorado Avalanche, a selection that few can argue with. Makar's exceptional talent and consistent performance have solidified his place as one of the league's premier defensemen. Quinn Hughes of the Vancouver Canucks, coming off a Norris Trophy win in 2023-24, secured the second spot. The real controversy begins with the subsequent rankings.
Zach Werenski of the Columbus Blue Jackets at number three has raised eyebrows. While Werenski is undoubtedly a skilled defenseman, some argue that placing him above more established and defensively sound players is premature. Miro Heiskanen of the Dallas Stars and Victor Hedman of the Tampa Bay Lightning round out the top five, with Hedman's placement drawing considerable criticism. Although a former Norris Trophy winner and Stanley Cup champion, Hedman's performance has been declining in recent years, leading many to believe that his ranking is based more on past achievements than current ability.
Further down the list, several placements have been deemed particularly egregious. Adam Fox of the New York Rangers, a former Norris Trophy winner, finds himself languishing at number 16. This dramatic drop from previous years has been labeled "disrespectful" by some, considering Fox's consistent offensive contributions and two-way play. Jaccob Slavin of the Carolina Hurricanes, known for his exceptional defensive skills and shutdown ability, is ranked at number 8, which some believe is still too low.
The inclusion of Montreal Canadiens rookie Lane Hutson at number 19 has also sparked debate. While Hutson had an impressive rookie season, some argue that his lack of experience makes it difficult to justify placing him among the league's top defensemen. Others, however, point to his record-breaking rookie season as evidence that he deserves recognition.
One of the main criticisms of the list is its apparent bias towards offensive production. Defensemen known for their defensive prowess and shutdown capabilities, such as Chris Tanev, are often overlooked in favor of those who generate more points. This emphasis on offense arguably undervalues the importance of defensive play in today's NHL.
Ultimately, the NHL Network's Top 20 Defensemen list is a subjective ranking that is sure to generate debate. While some placements may be justified, others appear questionable, highlighting the challenges of comparing players with different skill sets and roles. The list serves as a reminder that evaluating defensemen requires a more nuanced approach than simply looking at offensive statistics.
