Akash Deep's dismissal of Joe Root in the recent Test match between England and India has ignited a fresh debate surrounding "no-balls" in cricket, with many questioning the legality of the delivery that sent the former England captain back to the pavilion. The incident occurred during England's second innings, when Akash Deep bowled a delivery that clipped the top of off stump, leaving Root "in disbelief". However, replays soon emerged that suggested Akash Deep's back foot may have landed marginally outside the return crease, potentially constituting a "no-ball".
According to the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) laws of the game, Law 21.5 clarifies the rules regarding a fair delivery in respect to the feet. The law states that "For a delivery to be fair in respect of the feet, in the delivery stride (21.5.1) the bowler's back foot must land within and not touching the return crease appertaining to his/her stated mode of delivery". Furthermore, "the bowler's front foot must land with some part of the foot, whether grounded or raised – on the same side of the imaginary line joining the two middle stumps as the return crease described in 21.5.1, and – behind the popping crease".
In simpler terms, a bowler's back foot must land entirely within the return crease, and their front foot must land behind the popping crease. Failure to comply with either of these conditions results in a "no-ball". The primary reason for this rule is to prevent bowlers from gaining an unfair advantage by overstepping or encroaching on the batsman's space.
The debate surrounding Akash Deep's delivery centers on whether his back foot was entirely within the return crease. While the naked eye may not be able to discern the marginal difference, television replays and advanced technology can now provide a more accurate assessment. In this instance, commentator Alison Mitchell noted that Akash Deep's "foot on the back crease is out. Looks like by about two inches". If the back foot is touching the line, it is considered a no-ball.
The on-field umpires did not call a no-ball at the time, and Root was given out. However, the controversy erupted after the day's play, with many fans and cricket experts taking to social media to express their opinions. Some argue that the benefit of the doubt should always go to the bowler, while others insist that the laws of the game must be strictly enforced.
This incident highlights the ongoing debate about the role of technology in cricket. While technology has undoubtedly improved the accuracy of umpiring decisions, it has also led to increased scrutiny and second-guessing of on-field calls. Some argue that excessive reliance on technology can undermine the authority of the umpires and slow down the pace of the game. Others contend that technology is essential for ensuring fair play and eliminating human error.
Ultimately, whether Akash Deep's delivery was a "no-ball" is a matter of interpretation and perspective. However, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the laws of the game and the need for clear and consistent application of those laws. It also underscores the growing role of technology in cricket and the ongoing debate about its impact on the sport.
