Recent reports have ignited a wave of criticism aimed at Virat Kohli after it was revealed that he underwent a fitness test in London, while the rest of the Indian team completed theirs in Bengaluru. This decision by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to grant Kohli what some perceive as a "special request" has led to questions about preferential treatment and whether Kohli's presence is even necessary.

The controversy stems from the typical protocol that mandates all players to undergo the same fitness assessments. Kohli's exception to this rule has fueled the debate, leading many fans and cricket analysts to voice their concerns. Some argue that such allowances create a sense of disparity within the team, potentially affecting morale and team unity.

Adding fuel to the fire, details have emerged about the fitness tests themselves. It's believed that Kohli cleared both a pre-existing Yo-Yo test and a newly introduced Bronco test. However, the fact that he completed these tests outside the established Center of Excellence in Bengaluru is a major point of contention.

Social media platforms have been flooded with comments expressing disappointment and anger. Many fans question why Kohli was permitted to take the test in London and argue that no player should be above the standard protocols. Some comments have been particularly harsh, questioning Kohli's continued relevance to the team.

This isn't the first time Kohli's fitness assessments have stirred controversy. In 2023, the BCCI reportedly expressed displeasure when Kohli shared his Yo-Yo test score on Instagram. The board considered this a breach of contract, as the results were deemed confidential.

Despite the criticism, some argue that Kohli's stature in the game warrants certain considerations. His experience and performance record are undeniable, and allowing him some flexibility in his training and assessment might be seen as a way to optimize his preparation for crucial series, such as the upcoming One Day International (ODI) series against Australia.

Ultimately, the controversy highlights the delicate balance between maintaining team uniformity and accommodating the needs of individual players, especially those of Kohli's caliber. The BCCI's decision has opened a Pandora's Box of questions about fairness, transparency, and the future of team protocols. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen whether the board will address these concerns and ensure a level playing field for all players moving forward.