The debate surrounding Sanju Samson's optimal batting position in the Indian T20I team has been a persistent topic of discussion among fans and cricket experts alike. While he has achieved significant success as an opener, circumstances have led to him being considered for a role in the middle order, specifically at No. 5. This shift has sparked varied reactions, with some questioning the move and others expressing confidence in his ability to adapt.
India's batting coach, Sitanshu Kotak, has addressed the concerns surrounding Samson's suitability for the No. 5 position. Kotak asserted that Samson possesses the versatility to bat at any position the team requires. He acknowledged that Samson may not have extensive experience batting at No. 5 or 6, but that doesn't mean he is incapable of performing well in those roles. Kotak emphasized that the team management, including captain Suryakumar Yadav and head coach Gautam Gambhir, will make decisions based on the specific needs of the game.
Kotak highlighted the flexibility within the Indian batting lineup, noting that several players are capable of adapting to different positions and finishing games. He specifically mentioned aggressive players like Shivam Dube, Hardik Pandya, and Axar Patel, who can adjust their batting approach based on the match situation. Kotak reiterated that most players are prepared to bat at any number, showcasing the team's adaptability.
However, not everyone shares the same level of optimism regarding Samson's change in batting position. Former India captain and selector Kris Srikkanth has voiced concerns that batting Samson at No. 5 could potentially harm his confidence. Srikkanth believes that this move might be a way to pave the way for Shreyas Iyer's return to the team. He also cautioned that if Samson fails to perform in the next few innings at No. 5, Iyer could replace him.
Srikkanth questioned Samson's role in the middle order, considering the presence of Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dube as potential finishers. He also expressed uncertainty about whether Samson can deliver at No. 5 and questioned the decision to include him ahead of Jitesh Sharma.
Statistics reveal that Samson has had more success as a top-order batter, scoring 522 runs at an average of 32.63 as opposed to the 62 runs at an average of 20.62 he has scored at the No. 5 position. While these numbers highlight his strengths as an opener, Kotak and the team management seem intent on exploring his potential in the middle order.
Ultimately, the decision to bat Sanju Samson at No. 5 reflects the team management's belief in his adaptability and the overall flexibility of the Indian batting lineup. While concerns remain about his lack of experience in that position, the team seems committed to providing him with opportunities to prove his mettle in the middle order. As the Asia Cup 2025 progresses, it remains to be seen how Samson performs in this new role and whether he can silence the doubts surrounding his suitability for the No. 5 position.
